I'll respond.
Thank you for your question, Mr. Duguid.
You have to understand that official languages must not be subject to austerity considerations. Government develops budgets for the delivery of services, which should include services in both official languages where the legal framework provides. We would obviously like the broadest variety of services and communications possible to be accessible, even where legal frameworks aren't as robust.
The federal government's role is to set an example. If, despite its language obligations, the federal government is unable to provide the minimum of what is required under the act, the provinces might consider that they're also free to do what they want with respect to their own language obligations.
The provinces and territories have limited ability to discharge their responsibilities, but, by setting an example, the federal government could induce those governments to be more generous and proactive.