It seems to me that the basic rule in democracy is that the majority rules. You declared the motion out of order and we did not agree, because we had a different interpretation. No one has a lock on the absolute truth. We therefore voted to overturn your ruling and, as it turns out, you’re still saying that it’s out of order, even though the majority voted against your ruling. On a democratic level, we can call that into question.
I think the majority rules, even when the result of the vote is not to our liking. We can’t just agree only when it suits us. That’s not how works.