Yes, absolutely.
I know only a fool never changes his mind, and I know I can change mine, but I'm entirely comfortable with what I wrote. What's more, Mr. Beaulieu, since you quote the same passage every time I appear before this committee, I'm starting to be familiar with it.
I absolutely agree that the future of French is being determined in Quebec, particularly in Montreal. That's the first thing.
Second, I think that Canadian federalism has to be as flexible as possible because we know that, when federalism allows national minorities or minority nations a little flexibility, societies are more democratic. You can see that around the world.
Third, the territorial principle is definitely important. The 19th century theoreticians such as Otto Bauer and Karl Renner always said that it's the territory that's important for minorities. In our case, we have trouble with the territory, of course, but we also have the principle of institutional completeness. In francophone minority communities, we need institutions that are managed by and for francophones. That's what has to be reinforced. As regards positive measures and institutional completeness, the purpose of the bill is precisely to reinforce—