We should be on the same page here at the Standing Committee on Official Languages.
The committee also invite the following witnesses to appear and that they be divided into three different blocks for a minimum of one hour to hear the evidence of each of them: (1) the Quebec Bar and French-speaking jurists, (2) the francophone school boards of Ontario, British Columbia and Acadia, and (3) the Université de Moncton and Alphabétisation Québec—
As I just mentioned, it would be important to have a breakdown of the witnesses chosen by each party.
The Liberal Party triggered the last election. They got the most MPs, but not the majority they wanted. Two years have been wasted.
Furthermore, the Conservative Party is the second party, and the Bloc Québécois is the third, followed by the NDP. From what I understand, the current witnesses are being proposed by the Bloc Québécois. So I guess I'm wondering why the second official opposition party would be given this privilege.
Do you understand the connection I'm making with the subamendment, Mr. Chair?