That's excellent, Mr. Chair.
Sometimes it's hard to stay on track when you're being interrupted.
The rule that debates should be more permissive than restrictive is one of the parliamentary rules and allows for more democracy. It affords a tool for the opposition parties in getting themselves heard and expressing a point of view. However, Quebec's point of view hasn't been heard for 52 years. During clause-by-clause consideration, it will be critical that we conduct a thorough debate. If we adopt the date of December 6, 2022, we will only have a few minutes in which to proceed with clause-by-close consideration. We won't have the time to explain it.
We noted that health was a provincial jurisdiction, and that's highly relevant. However, what I'm talking about are the measures that the federal government has taken under the Official Languages Act. So that's absolutely relevant to the debate. We'll have to discuss it during clause-by-clause consideration.
Now turning from the health sector to access to justice, I don't think the Minister of Justice was even one of the four ministers we had to consult at the Treasury Board. Once again, there are some major problems there, and, once again, it's the federal government that's funding groups. I'd like to hear the answers and the Minister of Canadian Heritage on the fact that these groups are using a whole—