Both sides have the answer.
It bothers me to limit this debate, since I think it is essential.
We held an initial meeting in camera. During that meeting, we decided on a number of meetings. I think that brought us to February, because of the break for a month over Easter. We agreed to change the date to December 6. And then there was a motion to change that agreement.
The last time, we reached out to the government party to have members come and see us outside committee hours, but that didn't happen.
If they don't intend to give some space and allow a clause by clause debate that makes sense, it will be very difficult, regardless of the format. If there is a desire to have discussions and expand the subject, that would be fine.
I would also like to raise a point of order and come back to...