I can venture to do so. Obviously, it is not our amendment.
When, with respect to language rights, it says that “they must be interpreted in a manner that takes into account the specific dynamics of the official languages situation in each province and territory,” the suggestion is simply that when it comes to enforcing language rights, we take into account the reality in each province and territory. That is how I understood the proposed amendment.
As to whether it is necessary to add this wording to proposed clause 3.1, you heard Ms. Boyer's comments on that. Ms. Boyer said that the bill already proposed additions to the preamble of the act to accommodate the diversity of language regimes.
I will stop there for now.