Thank you, Mr. Chair.
I'll be brief.
I have two questions for Ms. Boyer.
I appreciate the addition from my colleague Mr. Beaulieu to try to fix the overall problem, which is that this is directing you to do something that is contrary to the overall intention of the act.
The proposal is to add that the clause proposed in the amendment, "not restrict services already available to the anglophone and francophone communities."
It would not, for example, if there was a new service being offered, stop you from having to do exactly what you mentioned before would be the consequence of this amendment, which is to consider how to limit that service in English in Quebec, taking into consideration that French services are to be offered more predominantly. Would that be correct?