Thank you.
In 2022, the Federal Court of Appeal handed down a decision in the matter opposing the Fédération francophone de la Colombie-Britannique and the Government of Canada. If a similar case were to arise in future, would amendment NDP‑8 mean that the decision handed down would be complied with or would it amount to what Ms. Boyer just mentioned, which is that the government would simply have an obligation to consult the provinces and territories? The decision demonstrated that, in spite of this obligation, the federal government had not taken the measures needed to include language clauses in the agreement, or that the measures it took were inadequate.
Am I wrong in saying that amendment NDP‑8, if adopted, would not not include anything that would prevent a decision like the 2022 ruling in the case opposing the francophone communities of British Columbia and the Government of Canada?