I want to say that it's not mandatory. In the case of Monfort Hospital, I am among those who donated money and supported the cause. There's no problem.
I do, however, want to say that according to the exact wording of the amendment, disclosure must be done "after a test case is brought", and not before it is filed. According to what I understand from Mr. Drouin's comment and his interpretation of the amendment, disclosure would have to occur before a test case is filed, but it's actually after it's filed that it would be done.
Also, if there is reasonable grounds to think that this disclosure could negatively impact recipients, as in the example Mr. Drouin provided, at that time, disclosure would not be done. However, I myself have conducted verifications with some people from the FCFA, who told me that once their case was heard, they did not see how disclosure could undermine the recipients.
It's public money. People pay taxes and members should know where that tax money is going. It's a simple issue of transparency. I consider the door to be wide open to make sure this causes no harm.