That's a series of examples that clearly illustrate the fact that one act can be designed to undo another. The thing about that part of the Official Languages Act is that it actively frustrates some of the legitimate language planning aspirations endorsed by the Quebec National Assembly.
Getting back to the reasons for challenging measures that are funded by pressure groups, the reference points of those reasons are distorted by a misconception of the place of English and anglophone rights in Quebec society. It shouldn't be forgotten that institutional overfunding creates an inequality that undermines social cohesion and inevitably creates two classes of citizens. I believe that's bad for everyone.
That's obviously an extreme view of the disadvantages that francophone minorities face in Canada. The people of British Columbia are a clear illustration of that. For years, they have faced disadvantages, been deprived of their rights and, in particular, suffered declining living conditions that are unacceptable in a democratic society.
We have to correct this conception, which should be based on the asymmetrical, not symmetrical, nature of their conditions. Consequently, if the means to do so must be centralized, they must be designed, seen and implemented with the necessary diligence once it's understood that it's francophone institutions and organizations that need support. It must also be understood that the Quebec National Assembly has and must have every right to conduct language planning within its borders.