Thank you, Mr. Chair.
I don't agree with your procedural analysis.
To begin with, you're saying that the meeting requested pursuant to Standing Order 106(4) had been closed. How can you determine when it ended?
And where does it say that a motion cannot be introduced during a meeting requested pursuant to Standing Order 106(4)?
As for the 48 hours' notice, we are aware of the rules. You are absolutely right on that score, Mr. Chair.
On the other hand, I think that in the May 10 letter, there is a reference to the situation pertaining to the Liberal MP. As to redundancy, one might as well ask whether anyone is being more redundant than anyone else.
As parliamentarians, we have to use the tools and procedural rules available to us. However, if you read the letter carefully, I think you will see a link with the motion I would now like to move at this meeting, convened pursuant to Standing Order 106(4).