In regard to the Subcommittee on Agenda and Procedure, I've been on committees where, if everyone is working and in good spirits, you don't really need to have a subcommittee. Most of the planning can be done right here with the body of the committee. We found that in the public accounts committee. That was an opposition-chaired committee and it was very effective. It all depends on what members want. Again, a subcommittee just means that people are going to make decisions, negotiate things, and then bring them back for ratification.
We have a very short timeline. I believe that we have to report in June. Given that, we may want to just say that we can plan our business as a group fairly well, lay out our work between now and June, and do away with the whole concept of a subcommittee altogether.
Again, that's just food for thought. I'm happy to go with the majority will here.