What I'm suggesting is that you can have many of those elements outside of what you're talking about.
Furthermore, I've heard the term proactive a thousand times. I'm supportive of saying, “how can we fix the problem?”, but we want to make sure we understand clearly what we're suggesting.
When you say proactive, who do you intend should be carrying out the legislation? What body? Does it exist? Would you be taking the current Labour Canada representatives, who already have experience working directly with the private sector federally regulated industries? Would you harmonize where they would end up taking part of their job component and training? Or are you talking about a wholly different regime being carried out by a wholly different group of bureaucrats and employees?