In the time that's available—it's so short—I want to go to the institutional side. We've talked about the conscience of the health care provider. I'd like to turn again to the institutional argument and to quite boldly put forward the point that if an institution of which the cardinal has spoken receives public funding, shouldn't they be required to provide all Canadians with the constitutional rights they now have?
I understand about the professional, and you've put some good arguments forward, but I'm still at a loss to understand why a body that receives public funding shouldn't be required to be providing constitutional rights that all Canadians now enjoy.