Specifically, in the lead-up to approval for someone to go ahead with physician-assisted dying, we have heard some models put forward.
One involves a physician; it could be a GP. Then there would be a waiting period for another GP, and that would be the end of it: the person could have their life terminated.
Another model would require approval from a GP and a specialist, which could include a psychiatrist.
A third model would involve some sort of medical review and discussion, but then the case would be referred to a judicial or quasi-judicial body for final approval.
In part, the question concerns protections for physicians who may decide to participate. How do we give them the necessary safeguards, to make sure that all the processes have been followed? How do we also make it clear for patients who it is who makes the final determination? Again, that has a bunch of questions in it.