We do not, for the purposes being considered for this. Where I think we felt there could be leeway—you've talked about waiting periods, cooling-off periods, and whether patients should require a psychiatric evaluation. We definitely don't feel every patient who asks for this needs to have a psychiatric evaluation, but I would think that where the baseline condition is mental illness—and here we're talking about refractory depression most of the time—most physicians would want that patient to have a psychiatric evaluation. I think that's just going to be good practice.
No, a mental illness shouldn't exclude you under Carter, but will it require other thought processes? Probably, and I can see where those people would probably need to convince the physician over an extended period of time.
Then there's the whole competency issue. Interestingly, we reached out to psychiatry associations. We should not assume, just because someone has a mental illness, that they are not competent.