What I'm saying is that the pith and substance of the bill belongs to the provincial jurisdiction. Therefore, based on criterion number one, the subcommittee could have grounds to designate the bill as non-votable.
October 18th, 2011 / 11:40 a.m.
Committee Researcher
What I'm saying is that the pith and substance of the bill belongs to the provincial jurisdiction. Therefore, based on criterion number one, the subcommittee could have grounds to designate the bill as non-votable.
See context to find out what was said next.