Other principles are also at issue here. The Supreme Court ruled that there exists what is called a community of interest. That is a fundamental principle of representative democracy in Canada. I do not believe this bill is an attempt to challenge the constitutionality of the right of representation in the House of Commons. This is simply about complying with court rulings that say there needs to be a broader approach taken to this than what is the case in the United States, where they have direct proportional representation with no nuance. In Canada, that is not the case.
It was mentioned earlier today that the Canadian Constitution is like a living tree. As a result, interpretation of the Constitution will evolve over time, and the Supreme Court has given its interpretation. I see no reason why this would not be deemed a votable item.
I guess there would need to be some debate, but this is a bill like any other. The House of Commons always has the right to propose other bills. Indeed, I believe the government will be introducing one in this parliamentary session, probably one of a similar nature. If one is not unconstitutional, I see no reason why the other would not be considered a votable item.