Yes, but if I understand correctly, this bill would lock in a province's representation. It would mean that a province could not be over or under that threshold. It would keep the same number of MPs it had in 2006. That is what this bill says.
However, the bill does not specify for how long that would apply. I can certainly imagine someone going to court and saying that this violates the principle of representation by province which, according to the court, should be fairly flexible. It has never said that it must be perfectly exact. Could there not be a constitutional issue here if we were to say we were locking in a province's representation forevermore? This is a bill passed by Parliament alone.