Criterion 4 would in fact be the one that is in question since we are talking about a government bill. There are no committee precedents explaining the criteria in more detail that could help me interpret them.
In the case of bills that are designated as non-votable items, in the past, the subcommittee referred to decisions made by the chair pursuant to a standing order that is more or less the same. This was regarding a bill that sought to reach the same objectives by the same means. In the current situation, some objectives and some means are the same, but there are also other objectives and other means.