That's the proposal of the bill. This language is only to be found in this clause of the bill. The language in the other provisions of the bill is different. The language that we find elsewhere in the bill merely reproduces language that is already used in the Criminal Code with respect to bail provision.
Going back to the language of clause 1, which would amend subsection 161(1) of the Criminal Code, there might be some discussion with respect to how to know that the victim is there. It seems to impose positive obligation on the offender to know where his past victim is. So there might be some amendment or discussion. I'm just saying that it's not.... I cannot say today without the benefit of all the evidence and the benefit of the case—