I would simply take the position, based on the advice of the analyst, that from the government's position, we would view it as non-votable; it's constitutional, but non-votable.
On February 2nd, 2017. See this statement in context.
On February 2nd, 2017. See this statement in context.
February 2nd, 2017 / 1:25 p.m.
Liberal
Arnold Chan Liberal Scarborough—Agincourt, ON
I would simply take the position, based on the advice of the analyst, that from the government's position, we would view it as non-votable; it's constitutional, but non-votable.
See context to find out what was said next.