Yes, I would like a clarification on that.
At the public hearing of the Subcommittee on Gifts Under the Conflict of Interest Code for Members of the House of Commons of the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs, you made a very clear statement that notwithstanding the rules of standing committees and subcommittees of those standing committees, a chair does not have the right to vote unless it's to break a tie. You declared your intention that notwithstanding that, you had every intention to vote, should a vote come to take place in this subcommittee.
So I would like a clarification. When you state you have every intention of following the rules, does that then mean you intend to follow the rule that, as chair of a subcommittee, you recognize you do not have the right to vote unless there is a tied vote of the subcommittee, in which case you do have a right to vote to break that tie? Is that your intention?