No, Mr. Chairman, the issue is not whether the committee's been misled by the member or whatever. Presumably, the member's coming to the committee with a grievance, if you like, or a disagreement with the Ethics Commissioner on the matter to which the opinion relates. Presumably, the member, in that context, might be coming to this committee, the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs, which is charged with giving general direction to the Ethics Commissioner, in the hope that he or she might persuade the standing committee to give a direction to the Ethics Commissioner on the particular matter so that the view the Ethics Commissioner is taking in his opinion would not be the view that would apply.
I'm just speculating that might be the process, and it's important that the committee see what the opinion is.