Thank you.
On what you ended off with, Mr. Walsh, this happens to be some of the problem, the lack of a clear and defined definition about what constitutes recusal.
With respect to the presentation you left with us, subsection 41.3(4) begins, “No order made under this section”, and it goes on to say that it's after the member “ceases to be a member of the House of Commons”.
I'm curious about there being a defined timeline in Bill C-2, where the code seems to imply that it does follow the member after defeat. In fact, if I'm not mistaken, there's a retroactivity of seven years in the code.
Do you have any comments on whether or not the code itself should--