Would you agree with me? The Auditor General, if I'm reading her report correctly, says you have a mandate, and your mandate is to improve public safety. When she looks at what's going on in the department, there is actually nothing in place statistically to show that the activities taking place are meeting that goal. There's nothing in place that is devoted to that fundamental goal, which is to reduce the risk to the public of firearms. There's lots of self-analysis about what you're doing and so on, but there is no analysis statistically to link the registration system and all the rest of the stuff you're doing with actually decreasing or increasing public safety.
Is the Auditor General correct in saying you really don't have any systems that can measure that or are measuring it?