Chapter 5 is the one I'm concerned about here now, where we want to make things right.
It was my understanding that the Gomery commission was not given any jurisdiction over chapter 5. As people may recall, that was the Earnscliffe involvement with things and so on. We had to have our own special study on chapter 5, because nobody was really doing a study on chapter 5; it was conveniently left off the table.
If Gomery had no jurisdiction over chapter 5, why would we be doing a comparison with something that he wouldn't have delved into?