Let me use the example of the expenditure review that was conducted. It was a bit of an ad hoc exercise, with an objective of savings that would be reallocated to other programs. It wasn't an ongoing review whereby, say, programs would be looked at every five, seven, or ten years in a sort of constant review of programs.
We note in the report that the departments we looked at that participated in that review, while they came up with the amount of savings that was the objective, really didn't have a mechanism for doing it. They don't have really good performance information. They did find the savings, but it tended to be an ad hoc kind of exercise.
There needs to be a more systemic exercise, based on good performance information and evaluation of programs, to say whether these programs continue to be relevant, economic, and effective.