In 2004-05, there was an expenditure management review, and in that expenditure management review, the purpose was to look at dead wood within programs. If we're not at war, for example, why do we need tanks? I'm just giving you a classic example. They tried to bring about efficiency in the way we spend the dollars.
This was done during the surplus time. When this took place under surplus.... Is it something in the mechanism by which the bureaucracy operates, or how does it happen? Governments can change and the stability is the bureaucracy. What is it that needs to be done to ensure that somebody is at the wheel?