I would say that I think generally the process is adequate. I think, though, that what this case demonstrates--and that's perhaps an issue we should look at in an effort to improve things going forward--is when suppliers raise concerns, who has the responsibility to actually validate the information? I think there can be a bit of confusion between the departments and Public Works. What is the responsibility of Public Works to ensure the equity and the fairness of the process? Over and above simply following a process, do they have a greater responsibility? I think that is where there may be some disagreement between us and the department.
On December 7th, 2006. See this statement in context.