At least we're getting to the crux of the matter, although we're still a long way from who should have caught this.
The fourth point the Auditor General made the other day was this: “The request for proposal contained materially incorrect business volumes”--that's this issue of the 60%, the 0.22%—“that gave an unfair advantage to the bidder who had the previous contract.”
Mr. Bennett, why do you not agree with that?