Very well, you will supply us with that. But we will check the contract because this is not what I heard. I think that you have to keep to a certain share of the market.
Let me come back to the Auditor's report, which concludes—and she mentioned this to us several times—that this contract had not been awarded in a fair and just way. For me, these are the key elements. This is really fundamental, and several elements point to that. There was really an appearance of serious problems in Public Works and Government Services Canada. When she told us that there was only one evaluator for the financial aspect, I had some serious misgivings. We are dealing with a budget of nearly $1,280 billion a year. This is a serious matter and I will come back to it. The committee members will discuss it again later on, but I think that this is a fundamental element.
There are 75-25% proportions in the weighting that are not explained by any document. Why was the technical side given 75% and the financial side 25% in evaluating the bids? For contracts of this value, this is really unacceptable. The Auditor was unable to find any justification for this. We can find justifications for contracts below $100,000, but for a contract of this size, we find nothing. This does not make sense.
Mr. Atyeo, in the contract for which you made a bid, you were told that 60% of cases would involve real estate management. There was a great deal of discussion about this. We hear that your bid amounted to $48.7 million, whereas the bid made by Royal LePage amounted to zero dollars. Do you feel that you bid on the same invitation to tender as Royal LePage did?