Yes. I must say that we issue tens of thousands of contracts every year. We can't claim that there will never be a mistake. We do feel that here there was confusion that should have been avoided, and we've learned a lot from this. We will certainly improve our processes. We may ask for more certifications of numbers and improve things that way.
In my view, when you take it as a whole, when you look at all the things we did to make sure things were fair, an administrative error or an administrative misunderstanding persisted. I really feel that in the interest of the taxpayer and service--and Royal LePage has given very good service--there's no purpose served in re-tendering this thing.
We should consider not exercising the option years, perhaps. I've been discussing with my minister the option of running a new process so that when the contract normally ends, in November 2009, we will have the result of a new tender. I believe, taken as a whole, that's the right thing to do.