I'm sorry, Mr. Chairman, I asked Mr. Badun to explain this double-dipping concept he was speaking about, not whether he justifies and believes he is right in the contract. As you say, that is another forum. It's the double-dipping that I don't understand. He is saying that if you bid more than zero to the government, you would get paid by the government and paid by the employee too. The government witnesses are saying that was not the contract. I need clarification. I can't understand it. Does the government suggest double-dipping?
On January 29th, 2007. See this statement in context.