Obviously there seems to be a place for different interpretations of this. Our interpretation is the same as the department's, which is the same as Mr. Atyeo's. Clearly, in the bid documents or in the documents around the contract, it says property management commission, and it has a percentage and it has a note and it talks about a ceiling price, and they talk about the property management commission being a maximum percentage of yearly rental.
Well, I think the way we all interpreted it is that, clearly, the person who's renting is going to be paying that. So why would...? I guess the basic question, the most honest question, is why the government would put that in if they expected to get zero.
So I think there would appear to be different interpretations, but we certainly thought, and government has agreed with this, that this is to be the ceiling rate to be charged for that service irrespective of all the services and irrespective of who actually pays for it, be it government or be it the individual being transferred. Otherwise, this schedule makes no sense.