That would be a yes? Okay.
I only have eight minutes, so I really want to move through this as fast as I can.
Now, it's my understanding that at some stage of this whole process there were some pretty clearcut directions that came down the tube from the political masters, which said that for this property they were going to renegotiate a deal with the existing landlord and that's the way things were going to be. You wrote an e-mail on May 3, 2004—and I thank you for the e-mail, because I think you showed yourself to be a very professional, dedicated public servant by writing that e-mail—and you expressed some real concerns in that e-mail.
Do you take the position that ultimately this lease arrangement, the whole process, was basically scrapped, and it was given to the existing landlord because the political ministers of the day decided that it had to stay with the existing landlord?