I'll just quote directly from your letter so I'm not misplacing the words:
...the decisions on this file have been taken at the corporate level and are in opposition to our regional recommendations. The following points support my position....
There are about five of them, and one of them makes allegations to memos and documents actually containing false information. I'll quote the last statement in your letter:
“This partly explains why it is preferable that I not write a memorandum to the minister on this matter because it would not say what certain interest groups would want it to say.
I find that a very intriguing commentary, and the five points you've raised in here seem to me to be all significant and substantial.
I want to be clear here. Now, this was back in the sponsorship era and so on. The Minister of Public Works at that time, was that Alfonso Gagliano, or who was it? Do you know who the Minister of Public Works at that time was?