I am going to raise this just because it's important enough, if you'll allow me, and I'll leave it for you to decide how to handle it.
Mr. Marshall, in answering for Mr. Arès, said that you should take a look at what he knew after he wrote this, in terms of the original numbers weren't what they ended up being in the final lease and that changed his opinion. But I want to bring to your attention the two sentences that are omitted on the photocopy of the binder, which I still would like an answer to, given that it's not a machine error, given that the page number has survived and the paragraph is above that, and I'm not going to let that go. This states, interestingly, “Ever since we approved the lease...on April 2, 2002...”.
So would Mr. Arès not be familiar with all the new implications of the new lease, what wasn't required that was asked for before, the new rate as opposed to what he thought it would be? Would all that not be known to him, since he references it in his first sentence before he goes on to make the comments I referred to earlier, negating Mr. Marshall's answer of look at what he thought later when he knew all the updated details?