Yes, Mr. Fitzpatrick, at the time when we were here before you on June 8, I was going on the basis that if the requirements were the same, it would be cheaper for them to move. That's what our analysis showed at the time, but then there was a new requirement, and when you looked at the new requirement, the analysis showed that it would be cheaper for them to stay where they were if you could backfill the other property. We felt we could backfill the other property, and that is the conclusion on that matter.
As far as whether we discussed these various analyses with the Auditor General, I do believe we did on a working basis.
Mr. McGrath, perhaps you can discuss that.