Okay. I don't need you to repeat that again. The point is that one Liberal politician wrote to another Liberal politician asking that all your work be overturned, and the taxpayers pick up the tab for an additional $4.6 million so that your agency would stay in a building owned in the majority by a prominent Liberal supporter. Is there anything that is not factual about that statement?
On January 31st, 2007. See this statement in context.