It is a question, because again, I have the Auditor General's report, who points out that the decision not to move cost an additional $4.6 million. Not one of you has given any rationale as to why that happened. You said there was a cost-benefit analysis to determine whether it was possible. Anything is possible, but is it the right decision? None of you have indicated that it is. In fact, you haven't even told me why you didn't need to move. Even if you didn't need all the extra space, it still would have made sense to move, because you had a building that you were locked into paying rent for, and that you were going to have to rent, regardless.
On January 31st, 2007. See this statement in context.