I understand the logic of Mr. Williams' argument about the other points. We have the option, and this has happened in the past when we have wanted to protect individuals from potentially negative repercussions, of going in camera. This committee has the ability to decide, when reviewing sensitive information, to go in camera to avoid exactly that situation.
I would be more than willing to have a friendly amendment that would say that any portions of those reports that name individuals be dealt with in camera. I would be willing to look at a friendly amendment to that effect.