Yes. I have no problem with the first one, asking for the internal audits of the RCMP, considering the irregularities. I have a serious problem with the other three, Mr. Chairman, regarding the Privacy Act and the privacy of people being named, where charges I believe were not laid, for whatever reasons—they may been administrative, more than anything else. We cannot have private investigations by the police in public indiscriminately. I think the following three points would in all cases reveal names of people who were not charged.
I would therefore suggest to Mr. Wrzesnewskyj, Mr. Chairman, that we approve number one, and that we ask a senior member of the RCMP to come forward to explain what happened and why these charges were not laid, rather than be given the files with names and so on.
I would therefore move that we strike the three bullets at the end. If Mr. Wrzesnewskyj wishes to come forward with another motion asking for a member of the RCMP to come forward to explain what happened, I think I would support that.