Mr. Chairman, there are two issues here. First, there is the problem with the management of the fund. We have every right to find out what was going on there, and I think it's quite reasonable that we should. Second, there is the criminal investigation into some people, who were never charged, and I understand it was because the time ran out. They may have been charged if the time hadn't run out, but that's by the way; they were not charged. That's a separate issue: why did the criminal investigation run out of time? If you want to have two separate investigations into, one, the improper management of the fund, and we can deal with the criminal one at another time and another place—
Don't let the two issues confuse each other. We have a responsibility to the taxpayer and to the RCMP members of the fund to look into this, absolutely, and that's why I say let's look at the internal audit. The internal audit likely lays out all the problems. That's what, as far as I am aware, started the criminal investigation.
The criminal investigation went nowhere, and we're not going to take it anywhere. I say to Mr. Wrzesnewskyj, if we hold hearings in camera and we find out something that we don't like, what are we going to do about it, tell the world? No, we can't. Once you have privileged information in camera, you're not able to do anything with it. So do you really want the information anyway, knowing that the RCMP or criminal investigation file has been closed?