Mr. Chair, the processes and the reviews that we do are really around the physical copies of the reports and the questions even about printers and all that. I honestly believe the processes that we have in place are sufficient to protect the physical copies and that they are not going to go astray.
The issue is that if someone is aware of the information contained in those reports and wants to be interesting to a journalist, how do you stop them from talking? Quite frankly, I don't know how we do that, except to remind people of the confidentiality, to remind people that this is serious, to tell them that there will be consequences if it is found out. But even to conduct an investigation, unless somebody says, “Yes, I told them”, which I don't think is going to happen, I quite honestly don't know how you get there.
We can go through and look at our procedures. We've done that, as have the government departments. There are improvements that we can make to inform people and to remind people of this, but over the physical copies of the report, I really don't know what much more we can do.