If I'm hearing correctly, what we're heading towards is that in the motion, this first bullet remains, and the second, third, and fourth bullets are replaced with the following: “That the clerk be instructed to subpoena or ask the Acting Commissioner of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police and the Chief of Police of the City of Ottawa to provide full and frank answers as to the circumstances surrounding this event.”
Okay, that's an amendment. I sense there is some consensus. Is there any further discussion?
(Motion agreed to [See Minutes of Proceedings])