As I said a moment ago, I don't believe the legal recourse to the Attorney General is realistic for a number of reasons. I think you might choose to do one of two things, essentially. One is to form an opinion based on the material you have here and report to the House on your concerns and lessons learned—that sort of thing—for future reference. Or you might do that after you've called some witnesses back and asked for some explanations. Again, they are lessons learned by a larger process, which might drive the point home.
Some witnesses, don't forget, might exonerate themselves from any discrepancies. Others might not. But that's basically your choice, it seems to me, not the legal route to the Attorney General. In theory, it's there. I don't think it's realistic.