I'll be very quick. First, I agree with Mr. Fitzpatrick in the sense that I wouldn't feel comfortable having assented to a motion that has a number of allegations already, before we have the witnesses before the committee.
Second, the actions of a motion like this seem more like those for a police services board than for the public accounts committee.
And third, I think if we do what Mr. Christopherson suggests in following the path we're already on with the witnesses, then we do have options that would lead more to the regular process for our kind of business, rather than to this way.