The way I understand it, if that overexpenditure was truly reported and recorded as 2002 and 2003 expenditures--that's your position--it would have exceeded the minister's commitment to Parliament in the amount of $21.8 million. Is that correct?
Conservative
Brian Fitzpatrick Conservative Prince Albert, SK
The way I understand it, if that overexpenditure was truly reported and recorded as 2002 and 2003 expenditures--that's your position--it would have exceeded the minister's commitment to Parliament in the amount of $21.8 million. Is that correct?
See context to find out what was said next.